I like television a lot. I realize this should be sort of an embarrassing confession for someone who has aspirations of appearing deep, intelligent, or very religious but its true. And I am a relatively intelligent person of faith. I should say that: first off, with work, and a three year old little boy, I’m pretty busy, so while my television is often on, I don’t pay super close attention all the time. Secondly, while I enjoy TV, I’m not indiscriminate about what I watch. I have often been appalled by the A- moral, even hedonistic messages presented on television, so I was pleased to receive a packet from the people at the Nielsen ratings group asking me to participate in the ratings polling this fall. This is something I’ve never done before.
Now I have to say that were it not an opportunity to put in my two cents regarding what is or should be on television, I would certainly not go to the trouble of participating. I don’t actually watch much network TV. I watch a lot of cable news, (Fox in particular), ESPN, the History Channel and the Travel Channel. Of course the boy watches Nick and Nick Jr. I had always assumed that the ratings groups simply monitored what their control groups watched for a week and assembled the results into a report of some kind. It had never really donned on me to question how they monitored my viewing.
Seems like kind of a stupid assumption now that I know otherwise. In actuality there is a fairly detailed log for selected viewers to fill out. It runs day-by-day, evening-by-evening for a whole week. The participant enters the names of the times, programs and channels he watches, as well as the number of people watching with him and their ages. Frankly the whole thing is a bit intrusive but it gives the viewer an opportunity to express an opinion to a venue that actually matters.
In spite of the fact that completing the logbook is a little too much like homework I plan to my best to complete the survey. It seems like a more reasonable approach to influencing the networks as well as the cable and satellite providers than boycotts and angry letters of protest. I would encourage anyone else on Nielsen’s list this fall, to participate as well. At least this way you know someone’s listening to your opinions. For more information on Nielsen and how they gather viewer response, try visiting their web site at http://en-us.nielsen.com/content/nielsen/en_us/industries/media.html.
Racial Bias in the Sports Media
September 3rd, 2010Early yesterday morning shortly after the sun came up I rolled over and flipped on a certain sports television network. As I lay in a flu- induced fog I listened to one of the most frustrating and (in my opinion juvenile) discussions I have heard in any news venue in a while. The topic at hand was whether or not Bret Favre had benefited from a racial biased in the sports media, that minority athletes would not have, had they behaved in the same manner! Really?! Is this how far we’ve descended?! As a teacher this sounds a lot like arguments I’ve heard from students who compare their offences and punishments to those of other students. Well let’s look at Brett Favre’s record.
Has Brett ever gone to prison? No, at least not recently anyway? Has Brett ever been in trouble for smuggling a gun into a night- club? No? Has Brett been known to hang around the women’s rooms of clubs and hotels? No? Has Brett ever participated in a sport where one animal was trained to tear apart another for the amusement of his guests? No? Does Brett throw himself week- long lavish birthday parties, and generally behave like he’s bi-polar? Not usually? Has Brett started to believe a little too much in his own legend? Yeah, probably. Does Brett need to hang it up before his legacy is ruined buy his indecisiveness? Again yes.
So now we ask ourselves how many of the above offences are annoying, and how many are actually offensive. The fact is I wish Brett would retire as much as anyone, but to suggest that he hasn’t taken enough of a beating over his behavior in the press is crazy. There is no racial component here. What must the media do, beat up all the harder on Brett because he happens to be a white guy? At what point can we as a society stop worrying about the racial context to every news story? Anytime a person (of any race) finds that they are either in trouble or losing an argument, they look for the opportunity to drop the “R” word. Why can’t we each be responsible for own individual indiscretions and short- comings? How about we hold Brett accountable for Brett’s short comings, and Big Ben for Big Ben’s and Michael Vick for Michael Vick’s and so forth and so on. The sooner we as a society stop interpreting every comment and event through the lens of race the better off we will be.
I should also say that I’m not suggesting that the press has been too hard on number four either. I don’t think he’s treated his teammates or fans well the last few years. Frankly, I’m tired of the Brett Favre saga. And I’m not just saying that because he’s white.
Tags: Birthday Parties, Bret Favre, Brett Favre, Flu, Fog, Football Race Bias, Hotels, Indecisiveness, Legacy, Morning Sun, News Story, Night Club, Punishments, Racial Bias, Racial Sports Bias, Sport, Sports Media, Sports Network, Sports Television, Television Network, Texas Racial Bias, Venue, Yesterday Morning
Posted in Socio-Political Commentary | No Comments »